nakabhoy

My Man City were kicked off the park by Spurs injuring two players within the first 5 minutes and having to bring on young replacements due to injury crisis i began thinking it would great if you were able to criticise the opposion manager and/or the ref (for not taking action), the FA then would decide on a punishment or warning for the club and a possible suspension for the ref.

what are other posters thoughts on this?

gavnoble

Anything that adds to the level of interaction is fine by me - it's the area in the game that I am crying out to see improved. It's kind of stood still over the past couple of games.

George Graham

A good idea, but imo SI should be (and should have already) concentrating on internal communication with your players/staff/board before worrying about external communication.

fatboyjohnmulhern

i think extrenal commubnisacation is also need improivement, i would like to request a special loan outside trainsfer window for a gk for example vbecause i am short on 1!

Nomis07

I agree totally, it hasn't seemed to change much at all and I think there is so much that could be added to it that would make me even more addicted.

The player interaction does need sorted as i'm fed up giving team talks and my ass man reporting no real change in the players. What's the point then.

Interaction with staff would be good to see and tbh the board interaction has barely changed since I started playing on CM97. Yeah they have added feeder clubs and ultimatums but what I really want to see is being able to discuss results with chairmen especially given the flawed confidence section.

Ferthepoet

Do u now those media interactions you get at the end of the year when you win the title, it woudl be good if they did not only came hwne u win you could have media interaction like: You came preety close to winning it, do you think you´ll finally win it last year or You barely managed to avoid relegation this year, do you think you would be able to avoid relegation again next season